Reprinted from the AEA NEWS, October/November, 1994.
Moisturizing and Cosmetic
Properties
of Emu Oil: A Double Blind
Study
SUMMARY:
Cosmetic and moisturizing properties of emu
oil were assessed in a double blind clinical study. Emu oil
in comparison to
mineral oil was found overall to be more cosmetically acceptable and had better
skin penetration/permeability. Furthermore it appears that emu oil in comparison
to mineral oil has better moisturizing properties, superior texture, and lower
incidence of comedogenicity, but probably because
of the small sample size these
differences were not found to be statistically significant. Neither of the oils
were found to be irritating to the skin. Finally emu oil fatty acid composition
was studied by gas chromatography and was found to have a high concentration of
non polar monounsaturated fatty acids which may explain emu oil's ability to
penetrate easily through the stratum corneum barrier.
INTRODUCTION:
The emu, a large, flightless bird, Dromaius nova hollandiae, is probably best known for being on Australia's coat-of-arms opposite the kangaroo. In the past few years commercial emu breeding has become a multimillion dollar industry in the United States, Australia, and other countries. Emu oil derived from emu fat was being used by the Aborigines for healing and pain control long before British ships landed on the eastern shores of Australia.
A number of Australian investigators (George
Hobday, M.D., a dermatologist and Peter Ghosh, Ph.D.,
FRSC at the University of
Sydney) claimed that emu oil has anti-inflammatory and skin penetrating
properties. Recently the Australian Department of Health classified emu oil as a
pharmaceutical product(l)
and registered emu oil in the Therapeutic Goods
Registry.(2) Finally an official Australian government publication stated "the
oil (emu) will find uses in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries".
We
performed an extensive literature search (Medline, Index Medicus) and could not
find a single report in scientific peer reviewed literature dealing with either
emu oil and its cosmetic pharmaceutical properties or its composition. A pilot
double blind study was conducted to assess cosmetic properties of emu oil,
namely its moisturizing and skin penetrating properties, texture and odor, and
irritancy and comedogenicity potential.
The emu oil was compared in this study
to mineral oil, a synthetic oil that is widely used in the United States as an
emulsifier and lubricant in topical cosmetical and pharmaceutical
preparations.
METHODS:
Human Subjects:
11 subjects were recruited and completed the study (9 women and 2
men). The mean age was 35 years
(age range 25-52, median age 34). 10 subjects
were white Caucasian and one subject was Hispanic. All had Fitzpatrick skin type
2 or 3 based on history of response to UV radiation. All had healthy skin and
people
with eczema and acne were specifically excluded from this study. Since
both emu and mineral oil can be purchased in the United States over the counter,
no human subject research permit was required or issued
by the Texas Tech Human
Subject Institutional Review Board.
OIL:
Emu
oil for clinical study was imported from Australia (Emu Vertica, Thalgo Holdings
Pty. Ltd.). Both Australian emu and mineral oil were placed in dark numbered
bottles by a pharmacist (Caprock Drugs, Lubbock, TX). Neither human subjects or
principal investigator knew which oil each subject was using at what particular
time. The code was not broken until all volunteers completed the study and
returned the questionnaire to the principal investigators.
|
TABLE 1 - The Oil's ranking by participants of the study |
||||||
|
Emu Oil |
Mineral Oil |
Statistically Significant Difference |
||||
|
MEDIAN |
RANGE |
MEDIAN |
RANGE |
P |
||
| Overall ranking of the oil | 5,000 | (3-5) | 3,000 | (2-4) | 0.020 |
Yes |
| Oil Texture | 4,000 | (2-5) | 3,000 | (2-5) | 0.540 |
No |
| Skin Permeability/Penetration | 5,000 | (1-5) | 3,000 | (1-5) | 0.016 |
Yes |
| Moisturizing Properties | 5,000 | (1-5) | 4,000 | (1-5) | 0.062 |
No |
Oil Composition:
Fatty acid analysis by gas chromatography was performed by Dr.
Margaret Craig-Schmidt's laboratory of Auburn University and the results were
reported in the AEA News September, 1994.
Protocol:
Prior to entering the study each subject was examined by a
university based dermatologist to make sure that none of the volunteers had
eczema or acne. The volunteers were instructed to use the first oil on their
face and trunk twice a day for 2 weeks. The human subjects were told to
discontinue use of any other lubricants. After 2 weeks of oil use, the human
subjects were briefly examined by the principal investigators for signs of skin
irritation or acne and at that time were given a second oil. The pharmacist made
sure that each subject received both emu and mineral oil. At the end of the
study each subject completed the questionnaire and ranked on a 0 to 5 scale (5
excellent; 0 poor) how much they liked each oil. They were also asked to rank
its penetration/permeability, moisturizing properties, texture, and any side
effects (comedogenicity, odor, irritancy, etc.)
Statistical Analysis:
The data generated was in a created ranking scale format [0
(poor); 5 (excellent)] and was analyzed by a biostatistician utilizing the
Wilcoxan Signed Rank test.
RESULTS:
As shown in Table 1, the emu oil overall
ranking and permeability was found to be clearly superior to
mineral oil. These
differences in skin penetration/permeability and overall ranking were
statistically significant. The sample size in this study was small (n= 11) and
it is very possible that if more people participated in the study the clear cut
statistical differences in the oils texture and moisturizing properties would
have been found.
When the participants in this study were asked which of the two oils they liked better, all 11 subjects (100%) stated that they liked emu oil better (Table II). Neither emu oil or mineral oil was found to be irritating to the skin (0%, Table II). Finally, when the oils were applied to the face, 6 people (55%) and 2 people (18%) reported the mineral and emu oil respectively caused 11 pimples, (Table II)
|
TABLE 2 - Ranking and side effects by Participants of the study | ||
|
Emu Oil |
Mineral Oil | |
| Oil Preference | 11 (100%) | 0 (0%) |
| Comedogenicity | 2 (18%) | 6 (55%) |
| Irritancy | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
DISCUSSION:
This pilot, a double
blind crossover study, clearly indicated that emu oil may become widely
used in cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries. We found emu oil to
be totally non-irritating, having excellent moisturizing properties,
a cosmetically pleasing texture, and a low incidence of comedogenicity.
The most intriguing property of emu
oil as far as cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries are concerned is
its apparent
ability to penetrate the stratum corneum barrier. The study
of penetration of various substances through the skin is an area of
an active research and is obviously important from the therapeutics
and toxicological viewpoints.Iontophorisis(3) and liposome preparations(4,5) are actively studied
as a means to increase cutaneous bioavailablity. Since most topical
vehicles have an absorption rate of only a few
percent(6), the drugs
and other active ingredients combined ,with more efficient drug carrier
systems are of major interest to cosmetic and pharmaceutical industries.
As a matter of fact, liposome preparation containing the anti-fungal
agent econazole (econazole 1%; pevaryl; cilag- Schafflausen, Switzerland)
and cosmetics with a liposene base are now available in the United States
and Western Europe(4.5).
Unfortunately because of high cost and other
technical problems neither liposome or iontophorisis are now widely used in
either cosmetic or dermatological topical preparations(3,6). If indeed, as we
report in this paper, emu oil has superb skin penetrating properties, as judged
subjectively by participants in this study,
and because of relatively low cost,
emu oil should be of major interest to dermatologists and cosmetic scientists as
a transcutaneous carrier system. It would not be unreasonable to try to combine
emu oil with topical antifungals, steroids, retinoids, antihistamines,
anesthetics, antiangrogen, and immunosuppressive
drugs to see if emu oil
improves cutaneous bioavailability.
Even prior to completion of this study a number of investigators became aware of apparent penetrating properties of emu oil. As was noted in the methods section of this article, the composition of emu oil was studied by Dr. Craig-Schmidt utilizing gas chromatography. The findings were that emu oil is predominately composed of short chain monounsaturated fatty acids allowing it to easily penetrate the stratum comeum. Another investigator utilizing thin layer chromatography (TLC) found that emu oil is essentially free of phospholipids thus enabling it to penetrate readily through skin (Allen Strickland, personal communication).
We believe that this apparently first
scientifically conducted study addressing cosmetic and pharmaceutical properties
of emu oil is very promising. We are in the process of organizing in the United
States a much
larger multicenter similar double blind study to confirm our
findings. Furthermore, Dr. Craig-Schmidt's research group is in the process of
conducting in-vitro transmembraneous skin penetration studies with
emu oil to
determine its transcutancous permeability. We hope that this and the future
study mentioned
above will fully assess the cosmetic, moisturizing, and
pharmaceutical properties of emu oil.
REFERENCES:
1. Commonwealth of Australia,
Department of Health, Housing, and Community Services,
Certificate of a pharmaceutical Product No.
92/0980.
2. AUST R 22759 in the Australian Register of Therapeutical Goods.
3. Singh J, Mabach HI. Topical Iontophoretic Drug Delivery in vivo: Historical Development, Devices, and Future Respectives. Dermatology 1993; 187:235-238.
4. Korting HC, Blechek P, Schaefer-Korting M, Wendel A. Topical lipsome drugs to come: What the patent literature tells us. A review. J Am Academyh of Dermatology 1991; 15:1068-1071.
5. Schaefer-Korting M, Korting HC, BraunFalco O. Liposome preparations; A Step forward in topical drug therapy for skin disease: A Review. J Am Academy of Dermatology 1989; 21:1271-1275.
6. Wester RC, Maibach HI. Dermatopharmokinetics in clinical Dermatology. Semin Dermatol 1983; 2:81-84.
All correspondence should be addressed
to:
Alexander Zemtsov, M.D.,
M.S.
Research
Dept.
Ball Memorial
Hospital
2401 University
Ave.
Muncie, IN
47303-3499
Phone: 317.747.8458 or 317.741.1975 Fax: 317.747.8459